Will Apple Be the World’s Largest Stock?

by Darius on July 21, 2011

Stock prices slumped around the world Monday [July 18], but shares of Apple Inc. shrugged off worries about a Greek government bond default and record gold prices and surged to an all-time high of $373.80. With a market value of over $344 billion, Apple has already shouldered aside Microsoft to become the world’s largest technology firm measured by market capitalization and is now second only to energy giant ExxonMobil among US stocks. It has all happened so quickly that despite its heavyweight stature in the US stock market, Apple shares are still conspicuously absent from the Dow Jones Industrial Average.

Apple’s innovative products are the gold standard for personal communication and entertainment gadgets, and the company’s fresh approach to store design generates sales-per-square-foot numbers other retailers can only dream about. As the company goes from strength to strength and the billions pile up on the balance sheet, it’s worth recalling how uninspiring the future for the company looked not so long ago.

Apple historical share price adjusted for splits to faciliate comparison with current $373 price.

  • $39: “Lately hitting a new high above 77, stock in Apple is not just high-priced—37 times this year’s estimated profit—but high-fashion. … Apple doesn’t tempt me.” Robert Barker, “Apple: It May Be Too Late to Take a Bite,” BusinessWeek, February 14, 2005.
  • $12: “But behind the hype and buzz surrounding the iPod and Jobs, there are problems stewing at Apple. Its core computer business, which still accounts for 70 percent of the company’s sales, is withering. … What’s more, despite their soaring sales, iPods are depressing profitability because of their lower profit margin.” Stephen Gandel, “Why iPod Can’t Save Apple,” Money, March 24, 2004.
  • $12: “I give them two years before they’re turning out the lights on a very painful and expensive mistake.” Quotation attributed to David Goldstein, Channel Marketing Corp. Cliff Edwards, “Sorry, Steve: Here’s Why Apple Stores Won’t Work,” BusinessWeek, May 21, 2001.
  • $11: “Our conclusion is that Apple has started down a path that will lead to its demise as a serious player in the PC market. … Further, we do not believe Apple will survive its next downturn, which will presage the company spiraling into insignificance as it loses any advantage of scale.” Excerpt from Dataquest company report. “Dataquest Sounds Death Knell for Apple,” Reuters, September 23, 1997.
  • $4 “Apple has attracted a growing crowd of short-sellers, professional speculators who bet against a company by selling borrowed shares they hope to replace later at a profit if the stock falls. The short-sellers, in fact, now hold the equivalent of 10 percent of Apple’s shares.” Steve Lohr and John Markoff. “The Incredible Shrinking Apple Computer” New York Times, January 26, 1997.
  • $6: “Apple may have few options other than to shrink the company or to eventually sell out to a deep-pocketed partner.” E.S Browning and Jim Carlton, “Apple Still Hobbled Despite Write-Down,” Wall Street Journal, March 29, 1996.

Over its thirty-plus years as a public company, Apple has turned out to be a very rewarding investment. One hundred shares purchased at the initial offering price of $22 in December 1980 have multiplied to 800 shares after four stock splits with a current market value in excess of $299,000. Over the same period, $2,200 invested in the S&P 500 with dividends reinvested grew to approximately $49,000. But how many investors would have had the patience to wait nearly three decades for their investment to bear such abundant fruit? At year-end 1985, for example, Apple shares were still stuck at $22, and by year-end 2002, they had appreciated at an annual rate of only 4.4%—well below one-month Treasury bills for a twenty-two-year period. How many of us could have stuck it out, especially with industry “experts” telling us at the time that Apple’s best days were behind it?

Some will study the ups and downs of Apple over the years and conclude that the roller coaster aspect of its business and its share price illustrates why clever timing is essential to successful investing. Our conclusion is that predicting the future is difficult and forecasting success or failure in the fast-changing world of technology is harder still. A tiny number of stocks available for trading today will produce sensational results in the years ahead. Owning a broadly diversified strategy can provide exposure to the market’s most spectacular—and unexpected—winners.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Blogplay

{ 0 comments }

The Four Most Dangerous Words in Investing

by Darius on June 9, 2011

the-four-most-dangerous-words-in-investing

This Time Is Different.

We would not be human if we did not wonder if “this time is different” every time there is a new wave of negative financial and economic news. As I type, U.S. stocks have just completed extending a sixth weekly drop, the longest slump for the Dow since 2002. The 2008 global market crisis and the struggling economy have left many investors fatigued. Despite two years of strong equity returns, some investors have been slow to regain market confidence. Many are accepting the talk about a “new normal” in which stocks offer lower returns in the future – a framework for describing how and why this time is different.

The concept of a new normal is anything but new. In fact, throughout modern history, periods of economic upheaval and market volatility have led people to assume that life had somehow changed and that new economic rules or an expanding government would limit growth. What they could not see was how markets naturally adapt to major social and economic shifts, leading to new wealth creation.

Let’s look at other periods when investors had strong reasons to give up on stocks, and consider the parallels to today:

1932: The US stock market had just experienced four consecutive years of negative returns. A 1929 dollar invested in stocks was worth only 31 cents by the end of 1932. Hopes were sinking during the Great Depression, and many people felt as though the economy had permanently changed. Many investors left the market, and some would not return for a generation. Amidst what is considered the roughest economic time in US history, the markets looked ahead to recovery.

US Stock Market Performance after 1932

                                    5 Years        10 Years        20 Years

Annualized Returns         15.4%             10.1%             13.2%

Growth of $1m                $2.0m              $2.6m            $11.9m

1941: World War II was raging, and the US had just entered the conflict. The US stock market had experienced two consecutive years of negative performance, and the economy had shown signs of sliding back into depression. Although conversion to a wartime economy would revive industrial production and boost employment, investors struggled to see beyond the conflict. Many expected rationing, price controls, directed production, and other government measures to limit private sector performance.

US Stock Market Performance after 1941

                                    5 Years        10 Years        20 Years

Annualized Returns         18.6%             16.7%             16.3%

Growth of $1m                $2.4m              $4.7m            $20.5m

1974: Investors had just experienced the worst two-year market decline since the early 1930s, and the economy was entering its second year of recession. The Middle East war had triggered the Arab oil embargo in late 1973, which drove crude oil prices to record levels and resulted in price controls and gas lines. Consumers feared that other shortages would develop. President Nixon had resigned from office in August over the Watergate scandal. Annual inflation in 1974 averaged 11%, and with mortgage rates at 10%, the housing market was experiencing its worst slump in decades. With prices and unemployment rising, consumer confidence was weak and many economists were predicting another depression.

US Stock Market Performance after 1974

                                    5 Years        10 Years        20 Years

Annualized Returns         17.3%             15.9%             14.9%

Growth of $1m                $2.2m              $4.4m            $16.1m

1981: The stock market had delivered strong positive returns in five of the last seven calendar years, and the two negative years (1977 and 1981) were only moderately negative. Despite these results, investors were weary from stagflation, which was characterized by high annual inflation, anemic GDP growth, and unemployment, and from fears of another economic downturn. In late 1980, gold climbed to a record $873 per ounce—or $2,457 in 2010 dollars. (By comparison, spot gold reached $1,256 per ounce in 2010.) Memories of the 1973–74 bear market lingered. A 1979 BusinessWeek cover story titled “The Death of Equities” claimed inflation was destroying the stock market and that stocks were no longer a good long-term investment.

US Stock Market Performance after 1981

                                    5 Years        10 Years        20 Years

Annualized Returns         18.8%             16.6%             14.5%

Growth of $1m                $2.4m              $4.6m            $15.1m

1987: On “Black Monday” (October 19, 1987), the Dow Jones Industrial Average plummeted 508 points, losing over 22% of its value during the worst single day in market history. The plunge marked the end of a five-year bull market. But in the wake of the crash, the market began a relatively steady climb and recovered within two years. The effects of the crash were mostly limited to the financial sector, but the event shook investor confidence and raised concerns that destabilized markets would increase the odds of recession.

US Stock Market Performance after 1987

                                    5 Years        10 Years        20 Years

Annualized Returns         16.2%             17.8%             11.9%

Growth of $1m                $2.1m              $5.1m            $9.5m

2002: By the end of 2002, investors had experienced the stress of the dot-com crash in March 2000, the shock of the September 11 attacks, and the early stages of wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. Although October 9, 2002, would ultimately mark the market’s low point, investors had endured three years of negative performance and an estimated $5 trillion in lost market value. A younger generation of investors had experienced its first taste of old-world risk in the “new economy.”

US Stock Market Performance after 2002

                                    5 Years        10 Years        20 Years

Annualized Returns         13.8%              —–                —–

Growth of $1m                $1.9m               —–                —–

2008-Today: The market slide that began in 2008 reversed in February 2009—gaining 83.3% from March 2009 through 2010. Despite two years of strong stock market returns, memories of the 2008 bear market and talk of the “lost decade” have led many investors to question stocks as a long-term investment. But earlier generations of investors faced similar worries—and today’s headlines echo the past with stories about government spending, surging inflation, deflationary threats, rising oil prices, economic stagnation, high unemployment, and market volatility.

Of course, no one knows what the future holds and clearly there are many things to worry about. It’s possible that many of these problems may be of greater magnitude than we have faced in many years, perhaps ever. So what should investors do at a time like this?

Some might say that recent events are so unprecedented that they call into question the wisdom of maintaining any long-run strategic exposure to stocks. Nothing could be further from the truth. The above examples offer a ringing endorsement of broad diversification and a consistent portfolio strategy as the best way to deal with uncertainty. This approach may not be a money-maker in a bear market, but it sure beats the alternative of getting crushed trying to time the markets and missing the gains when they inevitably occur.

The chart below shows the annual performance of the US market. Since 1926, there have been only four periods when the stock market had two or more consecutive years of negative returns. In addition, annual returns are rarely in line with the market’s 9.67% long-term average (annualized). The most obvious normal may be that, over time, stocks offer expected returns reflecting the uncertainty and risk that investors must bear.

 

 Investing is never a sure thing, but when we eliminate the unnecessary risks; when we eliminate the unnecessary costs; when we access the worlds capital markets — to put ingenuity and resourcefulness across thousands of companies to develop new ideas, new technologies, new products — we harness powerful forces to work on our (the investors) behalf and to put the odds of success in our favor. The biggest stumbling block in our mission is succumbing to the fear that “this time is different”.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Blogplay

{ 0 comments }

The Inexorable Movement of Oil Prices

June 2, 2011
the-inexorable-movement-of-oil-prices

Commodity prices, including oil, tend to experience extended cycles in their movements. Recently, Bill Miller, the highly regarded manager of the Legg Mason Value Fund, provided a wonderful commentary on the commodity market (shortly before the recent drop which saw silver prices alone go down over 25%). Since I couldn’t have possibly said it better [...]

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Blogplay
Read the full article →

What are the differences between stocks and bonds?

May 23, 2011

In this video, Quantum co-founders Darius Gagne and Dave DeWolf discuss the primary differences between stocks and bonds, and the unique strengths and drawbacks of each type of investment. Share and Enjoy:

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Blogplay
Read the full article →

Taking the Shine Off Gold

May 11, 2011
taking-the-shine-off-gold

It’s challenging to watch TV without seeing a commercial, or fast forwarding through one, of a gold peddler expounding on the virtues of buying gold, how gold has increased its value fourfold in the last ten years, and the “fact” gold is going to protect you against inflation. The spokesman is always a good looking [...]

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Blogplay
Read the full article →

Risks Worth Taking

May 2, 2011
risks-worth-taking

A wise man once said that to profit without risk and to experience life without danger is as impossible as it is to live without being born. That all may be true, but which risks are worth taking and which are not? The fact is even the most self-declared risk-averse people take risks every day. [...]

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Blogplay
Read the full article →